An Overview of Contract Law

The Extraordinary Importance of Contract Law:
Contract law lies at the heart of our system of laws and serves as the foundation of our entire society. This is not an exaggeration. It is a simple observation – one that too often goes unobserved.

Our society depends upon free exchange in the marketplace at every level. Contract law makes this possible. Exchanges in the marketplace always depend upon voluntary agreements between individuals or other “legal persons”. Such voluntary agreements could never work without contract law.

Contract law serves to make these agreements “enforceable”, which usually means that it allows one party to a contract to obtain money damages from the other party upon showing that the latter stands in breach.

Without contract law, these voluntary agreements would instantly become impractical and unworkable. Since such agreements lie at the very heart of our society and economy, and since they depend upon contract law, it is no exaggeration to say, as I have just done, that “contract law lies at the heart of our system of laws and serves as the foundation of our entire society.” Those were the very words that I used to begin this essay.

Stated more precisely, it is our system of contract law that underpins and makes possible the many private, voluntary agreements by which exchanges of goods and services are accomplished in our society at every level. No exchange is exempt from the contract law, which indeed can be rightly called the cornerstone of marketplace civilization.

In this article, I will briefly explain the different types of contracts that can be made, paying special attention to the common problems that arise in their formulation. I will also discuss how contracts are enforced or avoided, and how a wronged party to a contract can obtain recompense and other relief from the wrongdoing party. I will explain the principle of good faith, which in California is known as the “covenant of good faith and fair dealing”, and which has been too often overlooked by commentators and practitioners alike.

I do not aim to provide a comprehensive explanation of all the theoretical and practical difficulties. This is an overview, not an exhaustive treatise. Sometimes the overview will better help the reader understand the essential points, or the “forest” if you will, while the treatise is better for explaining the many intricacies and complexities that can be rightly called the “trees” of contract law.

Definition of a Contract:
A contract is nothing other than a voluntary, private agreement to exchange valuable things. It most often is an exchange of valuable promises. For example, a home-buyer might promise to pay $250,000 to the seller, who in exchange promises to deliver unencumbered title to the buyer.

Good Faith and Fair Dealing:
Most exchanges are straightforward matters that are self-executing and done without any problem at all. When I buy a cup of coffee at my local cafe (which I have just done so that I may enjoy it while I compose the present essay on my laptop), the cafe and I have made a self-executing exchange, which we have done without a hitch.

Ditto, if I buy a book at the local bookstore or have my car washed at the local car-wash. Ditto again, if I purchase airplane tickets from a travel agent, or have my house painted, or have my teeth cleaned at the dentist’s office.

Fortunately, most exchanges are performed on the spot to everyone’s satisfaction. Were this otherwise, our society and general commerce would soon become choked by controversy and disputes. Thus it may be said that our system depends above all on the good faith and honesty of our people. Indeed, the principle of “good faith” is central to contract law.

Every contract made or performed in California is said to include an implied-in-law covenant of good faith and fair dealing, by which each party to the contract agrees to act in good faith and deal fairly with the other. This has been construed to mean that one party to a contract should not try in bad faith to cheat the other party of the benefit of the bargain made by the contract.

Inevitable Complications and Controversies:
While most exchanges are performed without incident, not all of them are, as we all know. This is true even in the simplest of matters (e.g., the sale of a cup of coffee) and is even more likely in a complicated transaction (e.g., the financing, delivery, and insurance of commercial aircraft for an overseas company over a thirty-year term).

Let us take a simple example first. I will list only a few of the problems that might arise from a simple contract for a one-time sale of a single box of tomatoes. If you offer to give me $10 for a carton of tomatoes that I have sitting on a table behind me, and if I agree to accept it as payment in full for the tomatoes, we have made an oral contract that we can perform on the spot: You hand me the $10 bill, and I give you the carton. Nothing more simple or straightforward, right? But what if you discover that my tomatoes were too ripe when you bought them, and that they all go rotten within two hours of the purchase? What if I take your $10 bill, but then refuse to give the box of tomatoes, telling you to “beat it, scram, or else you’ll get hurt!” What happens if your $10 bill turns out to be counterfeit, or if you take the tomatoes but refuse to pay, or pay with a check that you later cancel or that is returned unpaid by the bank? What if the carton breaks while you are carrying it, and all the tomatoes fall to the ground and are ruined? What if you needed these tomatoes for the dinner you meant to make for your boss, who, in disappointment, decides not to give you the promotion he had earlier discussed with you? My point is only that problems can and often do arise in even the simplest, easiest exchanges.

In more complicated transactions, the possible difficulties are varied and sometimes difficult for the parties even to envision at the outset, much less address in an intelligent, orderly manner. Let’s consider one such example. Suppose a large American company makes a contract with a large foreign company by which it becomes obliged to design, deliver, and insure an entire generation of commercial aircraft over a thirty-year period. The possible complications might take me literally years to ponder, list, analyze, and explain. It could take a decade or longer for feuding teams of lawyers in several countries to sort out the possible complications that might arise.

To avoid such controversy, which results in burdensome attorney’s fees and an equally burdensome devotion of attention and effort that could be better employed in more constructive endeavors, it is necessary to have a proper contract in place at the outset: If the exchange is to be done on the spot and simultaneously, a written contract need not be used, but the parties should either reasonably trust one another’s good faith or have an exact understanding of the exchange before they undertake it. If the exchange cannot be performed in full on the spot, there should be a written contract to state the parties’ obligations and the essential terms of the exchange. A good written contract will also address at least the most likely complications that might arise, assigning responsibility for any such complication to a specific party in a specified manner.

A good written contract is one that clearly describes the exchange to be done and also addresses the possible complications that might arise during the performance of the exchange.

Different Kinds of Contracts:
I earlier provided a simple definition of a contract. Here is a more technical definition: A contract is a private compact, voluntarily made, by which the parties agree to exchange valuable things with one another. A contract comes into existence when (1) one party makes an offer that the other party accepts, and (2) the parties thereby agree to exchange valuable benefits on specified terms and conditions, with reasonably specific agreement on the price, place, time, the goods or services to be delivered, and the other essential terms of the exchange.

Intercompany loan agreements

It’s probably unfair to say that it’s a hallmark of a well-run company that it has established processes for documenting all of the processes which are key to its business. That would be easy to assert, but very hard to do. But if that principle did apply, then it would also apply to the creation and documentation of intra-group loan relationships. This includes cash-pooling arrangements, which typically amount to loans made by the various participating companies to the cash pool leader.

From a legal perspective, this is not rocket science. The key terms will include:

drawdown and utilisation of advances conditions precedent to drawdown term (repayment date) and the borrower’s ability to repay early (prepayment) interest rates, interest periods and compounding security and subordination events of default triggering early repayment, and default interest

As with any intra-group arrangements, a critical litmus test is whether directors can properly approve the terms of the loan relationship as being in the interests of each individual company of which they are a director.

From a lender’s perspective, this ‘corporate benefit’ issue is particularly relevant for loans by a subsidiary to a parent company or a sister company. It may less of an issue in the case of a loan by parent to its subsidiary, since the parent has a clear financial interest in the success of its investment. However, for upwards or sideways loans within a group structure, factors such as the borrower’s ability to repay the loan will obviously be important. It should go without saying that it’s not enough for the making of the loan to make sense from a group-wide perspective. The loan must also be justifiable from the perspective of each legal entity participating in the arrangements.

In one extreme but typical example, a group finance company made a loan of over a billion dollars to a special purpose vehicle (SPV) which used the loan proceeds to acquire listed securities in the market. The SPV was a sister company of the finance company – in other words, they were both subsidiaries of the same holding company. The loan was expressed to be repayable on demand. As was expected, the value of the securities fell almost immediately, leaving the SPV with negative net assets. It would be hard to justify those arrangements as being for the corporate benefit of the lender, in the absence of additional arrangement such as a parent company guarantee to support the borrower’s obligations.

From the borrower’s perspective, a parent company guarantee in favour of the lender doesn’t help. If the guarantee were to be called on – and the parent procured repayment of the loan amount to the lender – the balance sheet position of the borrower would not be improved. It would simply owe the same amount to the parent rather than the original lender. From the borrower’s perspective, it would therefore need some additional comfort, such as a subordination agreement with the parent or some other commitment of financial support.

Please see the following link for examples of short-form intercompany loan agreements.

http://www.groupreorganisation.com/?p=115

Legal Process Outsourcing Pros And Cons

If you own a law firm or you are an in-house counsel looking forward to outsource legal process locally or globally, basic knowledge regarding the merits and demerits of legal process outsourcing service will be of great help for you. There are various that need to be considered and negotiated before flagging off any contract with a Legal proves outsourcing company. It will help you to maintain a good rapport and working relationship with the legal process outsourcing offering company. Initiate your outsourcing process by doing an evaluation of all your works. It will enable you to decide the type of work that you wish to outsource. After deciding the type of work, its time to questions that you must ask from your vendor. Some of the basic questions are as follows:

What will be the cost for legal process outsourcing services?

How well the LPO providing company will be able to meet our needs?

Why should that particular LPO Company be hired?

In case of legal process outsourcing Company you should be able to deal directly with that company. Besides direct communication medium, it must comply with all the obligations and privacy or confidentiality issues of the client. A standard set of benchmarks and metrics must be followed to measure the overall success or failure of the services provided by the company.

The advent of legal process outsourcing in India started as legal support services but in very less time duration, this sector has witnessed a phenomenal success and popularity. Always focus on how much profit can you make by legal process outsourcing. Calculate how much you can save along with all the mandatory tax advantages. Pay attention to the quality of the service offered by LPO Company. Properly analyze the associated risk factors and risk allocation framework to develop a strategy to control the risks. One of such risk can be linguistic or cultural differences that can cause obstacles in day to day operations of your business.

In case things run bad in your LPO relationship. One of the important prerequisite for LPO services is to have knowledge of the laws of the country of the LPO Company. It will help you to easily resolve the disputes that might creep in during later stages. So be ready and prepared to protect customer and company information.

Protect Your Legal rights as an Employee Through the Help of Employment Lawyers NYC

The employee should have an excellent working bond with their employer regardless of the nature of their work. Both parties should benefit and grow in this relationship. Salary is provided to the employees in return for their time, know-how, and abilities while the employer receives the return of investment. This sounds great. Nonetheless, but this isn’t the situation in all workplaces./p>

If the labor law or employment law is implemented appropriately by both employee and the employer then work issues won’t possibly happen. Many people might end up breaking some work laws without realizing it since these laws are quite complicated. This is the main reason why troubles in workplaces happen. In times like this, the assistance of an expert and proficient new york employment attorney is crucial.

There are different factors why work problems are occurring. This is due to the fact that personnel are not all alike. They have different thoughts and religious beliefs as well as personality and characteristics. Problems at work are more likely to take place when the employer harasses his employee or perhaps, fails to pay him according to what is specified on in the contract. Whatever work-related concerns would that be, they could be handled by employment attorneys successfully.

Main Reasons Why It is Important to Get Employment Lawyer NYC

Wrongful termination and unjust payments are the most common work-related issues that result in litigation. Accident of personnel due to dangerous work practices and sexual harassment need to undergo legal process as well. There are also many workers who have filed complaints to the court as their retirement plans and benefits are not given to them. Engaging in a legal battle requires a tremendous amount of time, money, and determination. With the assistance and representation of reputable employment attorneys nyc, workers can conquer this challenge easily.

Making certain that their clientele understand their rights is part of their responsibilities. Clearly, they know what legal action to have depending on their clients’ case. The attorney will attempt to mediate between the employer and staff if the dispute is still negotiable. However, if the issue is serious, then they will represent the employee during court hearings.

Employment attorneys who work for employees always make sure the odds will be on their favor. They will carefully evaluate documents and contracts in order to finding any glitch that could assist strengthen the case. Then again, employment attorneys who work for employers/company owners adopt an approach called -preventive lawyering’. This is a method in making firm policies that are in accordance to local and federal/state employment laws and regulations.

When conflicts on employment related problems occurs, litigation is not always the ideal solution, a fact that professional employment attorneys is aware of. Considering that filing a lawsuit is laborious, these professionals find other ways to deal with it in a different way. A person’s career, life, and name are at stake when engaging in litigations that’s the reason why they have to consider their option carefully.

The written and oral communication skill of an nyc employment attorney should be excellent. It is also best to ensure that the legal professional is specializing in employment laws, and has stayed abreast with any changes in the law. The very best lawyers are sensitive to the needs of their clientele, despite being analytical in their approach. Only with these qualities will he win the case.

When you wish to get started at tackling the issues regarding Employment Lawyer, then you should go at your own pace where you’re most comfortable with. Hastening results in a poor circumstance as you’ll often find yourself missing over particulars which are important. What you need to do is to work on it consistently and you’ll realize how advantageous this way is. For clear explanation for Employment Lawyer Nyc, just search through https://www.google.com/+YoungMaLLPNewYork.

Is It Legal Or Illegal To Jailbreak Verizon Iphone

Recently, a lot of uncertainty has been circling around the issue of whether or not it should be legal to jailbreak 3G phones. “Jailbreaking” is now the common slang term for hacking into a Verizon iPhone, allowing users to run applications on the Apple OS that are not licensed or authorized by the Apple corporation. Confusion has now been cleared up by DMCA regulators, who have reached a consensus, which basically states that there is no unfair use attributed to the user who makes modifications to his or her iPhone, thereby making it operable with applications not approved by Apple.
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) is a U.S. Copyright law that makes it criminal to produce or propagate technology used to hedge digital rights management (DRM) which limit access to works that are copyrighted. However, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has requested that the jailbreak Verizon phone be added to a list of specific exemptions that will ultimately not be applied to this act. The EFF contends that the iPhone’s integration protection system is purely a strategic business decision, bent on preventing competition. The EFF also maintains that jailbreaking represents fair use of the firmware linked to the operating system.
This new revelation comes at the expense of Apple, which has profited on a closed business model, introduced in 2007 when the iPhone debuted. While Apple has stated in the past that is not legal to jailbreak, to this date no action, legal or otherwise, has been taken against the untold numbers of iPhone users who have hacked into their phones to use Cyndia, an underground application store.
Apple has currently sold in excess of three billion applications, and emphatically states that its closed model has been the key to the iPhone’s success. Apple executives feel that other cellular phone networks could likewise be victim to devastating cyber attacks by iPhone users worldwide if they are permitted to legally break into their devices.
Proposed exemptions to the DMCA are brought up for review every three years. From Apple’s perspective, the DMCA should protect the encryption (which is copyrighted) and included in the start up of the iPhone OS. However, the Copyright Office came to a different conclusion – that instead, the restrictions that a copyright owner might impose upon an OS are not covered under a law meant to criminalize the violation of those restrictions.
Cydia, the forbidden application marketplace, can currently boast about nine million iPhones having the app installed. This news, naturally, comes as a great relief to the folks at Cydia and other alternative (but not sanctioned) applications written for installation and function on the iPhone (such as Rock Your Phone, which sells an app that enables the iPhone to become Wi-Fi hotspot.) The jailbreak community at large feels that this decision has given it legitimacy.
In response, Apple states that modification of the iPhone OS can lead to the inception of work which is a violation, yet protected by copyright law – and that the applicable license on the OS prohibits any software alterations. In addition (and not surprisingly) Apple has found that the unauthorized modifications are to be blamed for OS instabilities and other technical issues. Henceforth, they have explicitly stated that such alterations will void the iPhone warranty.